The police found three houses full of illegal drugs. They also found guns and large quantities of cash, in the house. All three houses were linked to our client.We brought a motion to exclude all of the drugs, guns and money. The motion was successful and all of the evidence was excluded. The prosecutor was forced to withdraw the charges against our client. This is the story.
Police were called by neighbours, and told that people had moved out of a home next door and left the door ajar. Two officers arrived on scene and entered the home. The main floor and the upstairs were largely empty and consistent with the neighbour's story. Police then went downstairs and discovered that large grow operation was in the basement. The officers went back outside, called their Sgt. who attended and also looked in the house and its basement. He decided that they needed to get a warrant to search the premises.
They obtained the warrant and a full complement of officers searched the home where they found hundreds of illegal marijuanna plants. A hand gun concealed in the joists of the home, and a utility bill with an address to another house in a different town. The police went to the the new address and watched. They eventually saw a man come out into a field and burn a bag of plant material that gave off a stench that the officer believed was marijuana.
The police obtained a second warrant for this house and obtained a warrant to fly over the home and take infrared video which would indicate if there was a heat signature consistent with a grow operation. The police flew over with their equipment and determined that the house was hotter than a normal residence (an indication of a drug growing operation). On the strength of this evidence, the police then obtained a warrant to search the residence. They found drugs, money, guns and documents referring to a third location.
Police then obtained a warrant for a third house and searched it finding more drugs.
We brought a motion to the court to exclude all of the evidence because it was based on an illegal warrantless search of the first house. Even though the police had obtained a warrant to search. The warrant was sought only after the house had been search twice before. Once by the two officers initially on scene and once again by the Sargent who told them to get a warrant. It was clear that they knew that they ought to have a warrant. The location of the second house and the third house would never have been known to the police without the find of the utility bill for the second house. The evidence was clearly derivative of the first warrantless search. It also emerged that the airplane had flown over the wrong house with its infrared equipment, thus giving more reason to invalidate the second warrant and consequently undermine the third warrant.
The court excluded all evidence and our client went free, with no criminal conviction.
Canada's legal system is better than any other system. Our system is designed to protect you. And our system holds true to that goal better than any other. It recognizes that the police have extraordinary power and that they have to supervised and scrutinized by the courts.
This means that the courts will exclude evidence where it has been gathered illegally and conduct of the government or the police might bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
When evidence is excluded the prosecutions' case becomes a lot harder and sometimes it becomes impossible to prove.
If you have been charged with gun or drug offences, you need a serious and experienced lawyer. If the facts are against you, then you need to attack the facts. You might have been arrest with cocaine, heroine, fentanyl, or methamphetamine on your person, in your car or in your house. It's not over.
In these types of cases the first tactic is to exclude the evidence. This can be done by bringing motions or applications to court where there was no search warrant, where the search warrant was invalid or where the information to obtain the warrant was inaccurate or misleading. Well over 20 years of experience helps identify weak warrants, and expand the cracks in the prosecution’s case.
Often after a successful Charter application there will be little or no evidence left with which the prosecutor can use to attempt to prove the case. This can result in the collapse of the prosecution before it gets to trial. It can also result in a trial that is much more likely to be won by the defence. Arguing the facts of the case before a jury is much more effective when your lawyer can control what facts are available to be argued before the judge or the jury. Give yourself an advantage, in defending your case, by hiring a defence lawyer, with a lot of experience and excellence in technique, and court presence. Remember that with winning comes the knowledge of how to win. Knowing how to win comes with experience.
You have heard that you have the right to remain silent. You do have the right to remain silent and you should use that right. This si the most important piece of legal advice that you will ever get and it is fee. Never provide any information to a police officer. Understand that nothing you say will be used for your benefit. It will only be used against you. Usually the police tell you that anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.. If the police are talking to you it is because they want to get you to say something that they can use. If the police are talking to you they want you to talk because they need you to say something. Don't. The only thing that you should ever say to a police officer is: "I want to talk to my lawyer. I have nothing to say to you." Say this and only this over and over and over.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.